-
The case of Brown vs. Board of Education set crucial precedent for the pursuit of equality in education. This landmark Supreme Court case declared that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional. The ruling reinforces that all students, regardless of background or ability are entitled to a free and appropriate public education, ensuring inclusivity in the educational system. -
The Elementary and Secondary Educational Act was designed to close the achievement gap by providing federal funding to schools that serve low-income student, promoting educational equity. This was the first significant involvement from the federal government in education. The ESEA still influences funding and resources for special education programs, ensuring that schools can meet the diverse needs of students. -
This law prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in programs and activities that receive federal funding, including education. It established essential protections for students with disabilities, ensuring they have equal opportunities in educational settings.Schools are mandated to provide necessary accommodations to ensure that students with disabilities have equal access to education. -
In the case it was argued that the school district was not providing Amy with appropriate education because they did not provide her with a sign language interpreter. School district said Amy was performing well academically and didn't need interpreter. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the school district. The case didn't mandate the highest level of service, it laid the groundwork for ongoing discussions about educational equity and adequacy for students with disabilities. -
This civil rights law prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in all areas of public life, including education.It extends protections to students in schools, ensuring their right to access educational opportunities without discrimination.Schools must comply with ADA standards, ensuring that facilities and services are accessible to all students. -
This law expanded and revised EAHCA to ensure that children with disabilities receive special education services tailored to their individual needs.The principles outlined in IDEA guide how schools create and implement IEPs to support students with disabilities effectively. -
The Oberti case is important because it reinforced the concept of the least restrictive environment (LRE) as a fundamental principle of IDEA. The ruling established that students with disabilities should be educated alongside their non-disabled peers to the maximum extent appropriate, and that schools must provide justification if they choose to place a student in a separate setting. -
These amendments strengthened the requirements for individualized education programs (IEPs) and increased parental involvement in the education process.It emphasized the necessity of inclusion and accountability in special education.Schools are now required to actively involve parents in decision-making regarding their child's educational plan. -
This act aimed to improve educational outcomes for all students, including those with disabilities, through increased accountability and standardized testing.NCLB emphasized the need for schools to demonstrate progress and included students with disabilities in assessments.Schools are required to include students with disabilities in testing and to report their progress, ensuring transparency and accountability. -
This act promotes the use of technology to enhance the educational experiences of students with disabilities, ensuring they have the tools needed for success. It recognizes the critical role of technology in improving access to education and supporting diverse learning needs.Schools are encouraged to provide assistive technology resources to help students with disabilities engage fully in their learning. -
This act reauthorized IDEA, emphasizing the need for evidence-based practices in serving students with disabilities.IDEIA reinforced the importance of data-driven decision-making in the provision of special education services.Schools are encouraged to implement research-based interventions to support the unique needs of students with disabilities. -
This law replaced NCLB, aiming to provide states with more flexibility in their educational approaches while maintaining key protections for all students.ESSA ensures that the rights of students with disabilities are upheld while allowing for innovation and improvement at the state level.Schools must guarantee the inclusion of students with disabilities in assessments and provide appropriate support and resources. -
Case involved student with autism whose parents argued that the school district failed to provide an adequate education, challenging the standard of education for students with disabilities.Court ruled that schools must offer more than minimal educational benefit. This decision sets a higher standard for educational benefit, ensuring that students with disabilities receive meaningful educational opportunities tailored to their unique needs. -
This case involved a student with disabilities who was denied essential services, resulting in a legal challenge that underscored the need for appropriate educational supports.It highlighted the necessity of providing adequate services and resources for students with disabilities to ensure their educational success. The outcome of the case reinforces schools' obligations to adhere to IEPs and provide necessary accommodations for students.